Critical

Siemens Mendix Runtime

All CISA Advisories

Overview

Siemens has issued a warning regarding vulnerabilities in the Mendix Runtime, specifically related to the documentation on access rules for the System.User entity. Developers may unintentionally set overly permissive access rules due to inadequate guidance, which can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive user data or privilege escalation in applications. A notable misconfiguration involves the anonymous user role, which could allow access to all stored records without explicit permissions. Siemens is urging Mendix developers to review their access configurations in light of this issue. This vulnerability affects all versions of Siemens Mendix Runtime and has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2026-7891, with a critical severity rating of 9.1 on the CVSS scale.

Key Takeaways

  • Affected Systems: Siemens Mendix Runtime (all versions), CVE-2026-7891
  • Action Required: Developers should revise any security models that rely solely on XPath constraints for System.
  • Timeline: Disclosed on 2026-07-14

Original Article Summary

View CSAF Summary Mendix documentation for access rules does not adequately describe the special behavior of the System.User entity, leaving developers without sufficient guidance to configure access rules securely. This documentation gap may lead application developers to unknowingly apply overly permissive access rules to System.User, resulting in unintended exposure of sensitive user data or privilege escalation within deployed Mendix applications. A common misconfiguration identified is with the anonymous user role with a System.User entity to gain access to all stored records, even though no access rights are explicitly configured on that role. Siemens recommends Mendix developers to review their access rules based on updated documentation. The following versions of Siemens Mendix Runtime are affected: Mendix Runtime vers:all/* (CVE-2026-7891) CVSS Vendor Equipment Vulnerabilities v3 9.1 Siemens Siemens Mendix Runtime Insecure Inherited Permissions Background Critical Infrastructure Sectors: Critical Manufacturing Countries/Areas Deployed: Worldwide Company Headquarters Location: Germany Vulnerabilities Expand All + CVE-2026-7891 Mendix documentation for access rules does not adequately describe the special behavior of the System.User entity, leaving developers without sufficient guidance to configure access rules securely. This documentation gap may lead application developers to unknowingly apply overly permissive access rules to System.User, resulting in unintended exposure of sensitive user data or privilege escalation within deployed Mendix applications. View CVE Details Affected Products Siemens Mendix Runtime Vendor: Siemens Product Version: Mendix Runtime Product Status: known_affected Remediations Mitigation Any security model relying solely on XPath constraints on a System.User specialization to restrict access should be revised to enforce restrictions at the App Security role-management configuration level instead. Vendor fix Review mendix access rules knowing that System.User has built-in platform-enforced access rules that cannot be overridden or restricted by access rules defined on a specialization. Check updated documentation for further details Relevant CWE: CWE-277 Insecure Inherited Permissions Metrics CVSS Version Base Score Base Severity Vector String 3.1 9.1 CRITICAL CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N Acknowledgments Siemens ProductCERT reported this vulnerability to CISA. General Recommendations As a general security measure, Siemens strongly recommends to protect network access to devices with appropriate mechanisms. In order to operate the devices in a protected IT environment, Siemens recommends to configure the environment according to Siemens' operational guidelines for Industrial Security (Download: https://www.siemens.com/cert/operational-guidelines-industrial-security), and to follow the recommendations in the product manuals. Additional information on Industrial Security by Siemens can be found at: https://www.siemens.com/industrialsecurity Additional Resources For further inquiries on security vulnerabilities in Siemens products and solutions, please contact the Siemens ProductCERT: https://www.siemens.com/cert/advisories Terms of Use The use of Siemens Security Advisories is subject to the terms and conditions listed on: https://www.siemens.com/productcert/terms-of-use. Legal Notice and Terms of Use This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy & Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy). Recommended Practices CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the exploitation risk of these vulnerabilities. Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the internet. Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks. When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most recent version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures. CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies. CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies. Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents. Advisory Conversion Disclaimer This ICSA is a verbatim republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-814963 from a direct conversion of the vendor's Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) advisory. This is republished to CISA's website as a means of increasing visibility and is provided "as-is" for informational purposes only. CISA is not responsible for the editorial or technical accuracy of republished advisories and provides no warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within this advisory. Further, CISA does not endorse any commercial product or service. Please contact Siemens ProductCERT directly for any questions regarding this advisory. Revision History Initial Release Date: 2026-07-14 Date Revision Summary 2026-07-14 1 Publication Date 2026-07-28 2 Initial CISA Republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-814963 advisory Legal Notice and Terms of Use

Impact

Siemens Mendix Runtime (all versions), CVE-2026-7891

Exploitation Status

No active exploitation has been reported at this time. However, organizations should still apply patches promptly as proof-of-concept code may exist.

Timeline

Disclosed on 2026-07-14

Remediation

Developers should revise any security models that rely solely on XPath constraints for System.User access. It's important to enforce restrictions at the App Security role-management configuration level. Additionally, users should consult the updated Mendix documentation to understand the built-in platform-enforced access rules that cannot be overridden.

Additional Information

This threat intelligence is aggregated from trusted cybersecurity sources. For the most up-to-date information, technical details, and official vendor guidance, please refer to the original article linked below.

Related Topics: This incident relates to CVE, Vulnerability, Privilege Escalation, and 1 more.

Related Coverage

Claude AI Just Cracked a Post-Quantum Test Scheme and Found a Faster 7-Round AES Attack

The Hacker News

Anthropic's Claude Mythos Preview has successfully developed a key-recovery attack against HAWK-256, a post-quantum signature scheme. This new attack utilizes a previously unexploited symmetry in the underlying lattice structure, potentially compromising the security of systems relying on HAWK-256. Additionally, the researchers reported a significant speed increase for an attack on seven-round AES-128, achieving a 200- to 800-fold performance boost, which could make this encryption easier to break. The implementation is designed to run on a powerful 96-core server, completing in roughly three hours and 42 minutes. This advancement poses a major concern for organizations using these cryptographic methods, as it could lead to faster and more efficient attacks on sensitive data.

Jul 28, 2026

CISA shares advice on isolating vital systems during cyberattacks

BleepingComputer

The U.S. and Australian governments have issued new guidance for organizations that manage critical infrastructure, emphasizing the need to prepare for isolating essential operational technology systems during cyberattacks or significant disruptions. This recommendation comes as a proactive measure to protect vital services from potential cyber threats. By isolating these systems, organizations can limit the impact of an attack and maintain operational integrity. The advice is particularly relevant for sectors such as energy, water, and transportation, where disruptions can have severe consequences for public safety and national security. This guidance aims to help organizations strengthen their defenses and ensure continuity of service in the face of growing cyber risks.

Jul 28, 2026

FBI sees Anthropic’s Mythos as a law enforcement challenge

CyberScoop

The FBI has expressed concerns regarding Anthropic's AI model, Mythos, viewing it as a potential challenge for law enforcement. As AI technologies advance, the FBI is worried that such systems could be exploited for malicious purposes, complicating their ability to investigate crimes and maintain public safety. This concern reflects a broader trend where law enforcement agencies are grappling with the implications of rapidly evolving AI tools in the hands of bad actors. The FBI's stance signals the need for more dialogue about how to balance innovation in AI with the necessary safeguards to protect society. This situation emphasizes the importance of proactive measures in developing AI technologies to prevent misuse.

Jul 28, 2026

Is your smart TV a secret proxy? LG to suspend rogue apps, Samsung sets impacted too

Latest news

Recent reports have revealed that certain smart TV apps from LG and Samsung may be unintentionally acting as proxies, relaying other users' internet traffic. This situation raises significant privacy concerns for those who use these devices, as their personal data could be exposed without their consent. LG has announced plans to suspend the rogue apps involved, while Samsung has also acknowledged the issue and is assessing its impact. Users are encouraged to check their devices for affected apps and take necessary precautions to protect their privacy. This incident serves as a reminder of the potential vulnerabilities in smart devices that many people may overlook.

Jul 28, 2026

Bugs in Hugging Face Diffusers Bypass Custom Code Safeguard

Infosecurity Magazine

Recent findings reveal that three vulnerabilities, identified as CVEs, in Hugging Face's diffusers library can allow malicious model repositories to execute code on any machine that loads them. This means that users who download and run models from compromised repositories could unwittingly expose their systems to harmful code. The implications are significant, especially for developers and researchers who rely on Hugging Face's tools for machine learning projects. It's crucial for users to be aware of these vulnerabilities to protect their environments and data. Researchers highlight the need for vigilance when sourcing machine learning models from public repositories.

Jul 28, 2026

AI-assisted security tools are finding more bugs, but the threat level has not changed

CyberScoop

A recent analysis by VulnCheck reveals that while AI-assisted security tools are identifying more software vulnerabilities, the rate at which these flaws are being exploited remains unchanged compared to traditional vulnerabilities. This suggests that despite advancements in technology, attackers are not necessarily faster at leveraging newly discovered bugs. The findings indicate that organizations using AI tools may not see an immediate reduction in risk, as the exploitation timelines for vulnerabilities have remained consistent. As companies continue to integrate AI into their security practices, it is crucial for them to maintain vigilance and not solely rely on automated tools to manage their cybersecurity posture.

Jul 28, 2026