Critical

Hitachi Energy APM Edge Product

All CISA Advisories

Overview

Hitachi Energy has reported vulnerabilities affecting its APM Edge product, specifically versions 6.10 and earlier. These vulnerabilities, identified as CVE-2026-43284 and CVE-2026-43500, could allow local unprivileged users to escalate their privileges to root. The flaws stem from issues in the Linux kernel's handling of network packets, which could lead to unauthorized access to critical system binaries. This poses significant risks to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected systems, particularly in the energy sector where APM Edge is deployed globally. Users are advised to disable certain kernel modules to mitigate these risks while further remediation steps are being evaluated.

Key Takeaways

  • Affected Systems: Hitachi Energy APM Edge product versions 6.10 and earlier, CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-43500.
  • Action Required: Disable the esp4 and esp6 modules to mitigate the CVE-2026-43284 vulnerability, and disable the rxrpc module for CVE-2026-43500.
  • Timeline: Newly disclosed

Original Article Summary

View CSAF Summary Hitachi Energy is aware of Dirty Frag vulnerabilities that affect APM Edge product versions listed in this document. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could result in impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the product. Please refer to the Recommended Immediate Actions for information about the mitigation/remediation. The following versions of Hitachi Energy APM Edge Product are affected: APM Edge vers:APM_Edge/<=6.10 (CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-43500) CVSS Vendor Equipment Vulnerabilities v3 8.8 Hitachi Energy Hitachi Energy APM Edge Product Write-what-where Condition, Out-of-bounds Write Background Critical Infrastructure Sectors: Energy Countries/Areas Deployed: Worldwide Company Headquarters Location: Switzerland Vulnerabilities Expand All + CVE-2026-43284 CWE-123: Write-what-where Condition A vulnerability exists in the IPsec ESP subsystem (esp4, esp6) of the Linux kernel used in APM Edge that allows a local unprivileged user to escalate privileges to root. The flaw exists in how the kernel handles memory pages when processing ESP encrypted network packets. An attacker can craft a packet that causes the kernel to decrypt data directly into memory pages it does not own, including the cached copies of privileged operating system binaries. When one of those binaries is executed, the attacker's injected code runs with root privileges. In APM Edge, the vulnerable kernel modules (esp4, esp6) can be loaded by any local user and exploited. View CVE Details Affected Products Hitachi Energy APM Edge Product Vendor: Hitachi Energy Product Version: APM Edge versions 6.10 and prior Product Status: known_affected Remediations Mitigation Disable the esp4 and esp6 modules [2] Relevant CWE: CWE-123 Write-what-where Condition Metrics CVSS Version Base Score Base Severity Vector String 3.1 8.8 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H CVE-2026-43500 CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write A vulnerability exists in the RxRPC protocol implementation of Linux kernel used in APM Edge that allows a local unprivileged user to escalate privileges to root. RxRPC incorrectly processes incoming network packets that carry externally owned memory fragments. During packet processing, the kernel writes decrypted data directly into memory pages it does not own, including cached copies of privileged operating system binaries. Upon execution of a corrupted binary, the attacker's injected code runs with root privileges. In APM Edge, the vulnerable kernel module (rxrpc) can be loaded by any local user and exploited. View CVE Details Affected Products Hitachi Energy APM Edge Product Vendor: Hitachi Energy Product Version: APM Edge versions 6.10 and prior Product Status: known_affected Remediations Mitigation Disable the rxrpc module [2] Relevant CWE: CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write Metrics CVSS Version Base Score Base Severity Vector String 3.1 7.8 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H Acknowledgments Hitachi Energy Internal Team reported these vulnerabilities to CISA Notice The information in this document is subject to change without notice and should not be construed as a commitment by Hitachi Energy. Hitachi Energy provides no warranty, express or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, for the information contained in this document, and assumes no responsibility for any errors that may appear in this document. In no event shall Hitachi Energy or any of its suppliers be liable for direct, indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages of any nature or kind arising from the use of this document, or from the use of any hardware or software described in this document, even if Hitachi Energy or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. This document and parts hereof must not be reproduced or copied without written permission from Hitachi Energy and the contents hereof must not be imparted to a third party nor used for any unauthorized purpose. All rights to registrations and trademarks reside with their respective owners. Support For additional information and support please contact your product provider or Hitachi Energy service organization. For contact information, see https://www.hitachienergy.com/contact-us/ for Hitachi Energy contact-centers. General Mitigation Factors Recommended security practices and firewall configurations can help protect a process control network from attacks that originate from outside the network. Such practices include that process control systems are physically protected from direct access by unauthorized personnel, have no direct connections to the Internet, and are separated from other networks by means of a firewall system that has a minimal number of ports exposed, and others that have to be evaluated case by case. Process control systems should not be used for Internet surfing, instant messaging, or receiving e-mails. Portable computers and removable storage media should be carefully scanned for viruses before they are connected to a control system. Proper password policies and processes should be followed. Additional information on Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity Best Practices can be found in the Hitachi Energy “Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity Best Practices” Cybersecurity Notification. [1] SSVC SSVCv2/E:N/A:N/2026-07-24T07:30:06Z/ Legal Notice and Terms of Use This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy & Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy). Recommended Practices CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the exploitation risk of this vulnerability. Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the internet. Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks. When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most recent version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures. CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies. CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies. Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents. Advisory Conversion Disclaimer This ICSA is a verbatim republication of Hitachi Energy PSIRT 8DBD000256 from a direct conversion of the vendor's Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) advisory. This is republished to CISA's website as a means of increasing visibility and is provided "as-is" for informational purposes only. CISA is not responsible for the editorial or technical accuracy of republished advisories and provides no warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within this advisory. Further, CISA does not endorse any commercial product or service. Please contact Hitachi Energy PSIRT directly for any questions regarding this advisory. Revision History Initial Release Date: 2026-07-28 Date Revision Summary 2026-07-28 1 Initial public release 2026-08-13 2 Initial CISA Republication of Hitachi Energy PSIRT 8DBD000256 advisory Legal Notice and Terms of Use

Impact

Hitachi Energy APM Edge product versions 6.10 and earlier, CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-43500.

Exploitation Status

No active exploitation has been reported at this time. However, organizations should still apply patches promptly as proof-of-concept code may exist.

Timeline

Newly disclosed

Remediation

Disable the esp4 and esp6 modules to mitigate the CVE-2026-43284 vulnerability, and disable the rxrpc module for CVE-2026-43500.

Additional Information

This threat intelligence is aggregated from trusted cybersecurity sources. For the most up-to-date information, technical details, and official vendor guidance, please refer to the original article linked below.

Related Topics: This incident relates to Linux, CVE, Vulnerability, and 1 more.

Related Coverage

CMMC Phase 2 suspended: What defense contractors need to know

SCM feed for Latest

The Department of Defense has paused the implementation of CMMC Phase 2, which was intended to enhance cybersecurity standards among defense contractors. Despite this suspension, companies in the defense sector are still required to comply with existing cybersecurity requirements to protect sensitive information. This decision affects a wide range of contractors who must continue to meet the standards set by previous phases of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). The pause raises questions about future compliance timelines and the overall effectiveness of cybersecurity measures within the defense supply chain. Contractors should stay informed and maintain their cybersecurity protocols to safeguard their systems against potential threats.

Aug 24, 2026

Cybercriminals Turn GTA VI Leaks Into Malware Bait

Security Affairs

Cybercriminals are exploiting the excitement surrounding the upcoming game, GTA VI, by distributing a fake 113GB build that contains malware. This malicious software is cleverly concealed within massive empty files, hiding a small but dangerous payload. Many eager fans are falling victim to this scam, with some even encouraging each other to download the file to verify the authenticity of the leaks. This situation raises significant concerns about user safety, as individuals risk infecting their own computers in pursuit of gaming news. It's a stark reminder that in the world of gaming, especially during hype periods, caution is essential to avoid malware traps.

Aug 24, 2026

NIST Warns of Unique Security Risks in Multi-Cloud Environments

Infosecurity Magazine

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has identified 23 new security challenges that arise specifically in multi-cloud environments. This guidance is aimed at encouraging the cybersecurity community to address these unique risks, which can complicate data management and security protocols across different cloud platforms. As more organizations adopt multi-cloud strategies for flexibility and cost-effectiveness, understanding these challenges becomes critical to safeguarding sensitive information. NIST's call to action is particularly relevant for businesses that rely on multiple cloud services, as they face increased complexity in ensuring their data remains secure. The agency's emphasis on collaboration within the cyber community underscores the need for innovative solutions to these emerging issues.

Aug 24, 2026

ReliaQuest confirms failed data-theft attack after ShinyHunters breach

BleepingComputer

ReliaQuest, a cybersecurity company, has confirmed that an employee was targeted in a social engineering attack by hackers impersonating a member of their security team. This incident follows a previous breach involving the hacker group ShinyHunters, known for stealing and leaking data from various organizations. Although ReliaQuest has stated that no data was successfully stolen in this attempt, the incident raises concerns about the effectiveness of internal security protocols and employee training regarding social engineering tactics. It serves as a reminder of the ongoing risks that companies face from sophisticated phishing schemes and the need for vigilant security practices. The implications of such attacks can be significant, leading to potential data breaches and loss of trust among clients and partners.

Aug 24, 2026

⚡ Weekly Recap: AI-Powered PLC Attacks, GitLab Attacks, Stripe Key Leaks and More

The Hacker News

This week saw a rise in attacks leveraging AI to exploit Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), which are crucial in industrial automation. Researchers noted that trusted tools have been manipulated, making it easier for attackers to exploit existing vulnerabilities in these systems. Additionally, there were reported breaches involving GitLab, where sensitive data was compromised, and Stripe faced key leaks that could jeopardize user accounts. These incidents emphasize the need for companies to prioritize security measures and update their systems regularly to fend off these evolving threats. The implications are significant, as industries rely heavily on these technologies, and any exploitation can lead to serious operational disruptions.

Aug 24, 2026

The OWASP LLM Top 10: What Application Security Teams Need to Know About LLM Vulnerabilities

SCM feed for Latest

The OWASP Foundation has introduced the 'LLM Top 10', a list focused on vulnerabilities associated with Large Language Models (LLMs) that application security teams should be aware of. This list identifies potential risks such as data leakage, prompt injection, and model inversion attacks that can affect the integrity and confidentiality of applications using LLMs. Companies leveraging these models for various applications, including chatbots and automated content generation, need to understand these vulnerabilities to protect their systems. The growing use of LLMs in commercial products means that addressing these risks is crucial for maintaining user trust and ensuring the security of sensitive data. Organizations are encouraged to implement security measures and best practices to mitigate these vulnerabilities.

Aug 24, 2026