Critical

CISA Releases Guide to Mitigate Risks from Bulletproof Hosting Providers

All CISA Advisories

Overview

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has released a guide to help Internet Service Providers (ISPs) mitigate risks associated with Bulletproof Hosting (BPH) providers that facilitate cybercriminal activities like ransomware and phishing. The guide emphasizes the importance of collaboration and proactive measures to reduce the effectiveness of BPH infrastructure, which poses significant threats to critical systems and services.

Key Takeaways

  • Affected Systems: Bulletproof Hosting providers, cybercriminal activities including ransomware, phishing, malware delivery, denial-of-service attacks.
  • Action Required: Curate malicious resource lists, implement filters to block malicious traffic, analyze network traffic for anomalies, use logging systems to track ASNs and IP addresses, share intelligence with public and private entities, notify customers about malicious resources, provide premade filters, set accountability standards, and vet customers to prevent BPH abuse.
  • Timeline: Newly disclosed

Original Article Summary

Today, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), in collaboration with the U.S. National Security Agency, U.S. Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center, U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, and international partners, released the guide Bulletproof Defense: Mitigating Risks from Bulletproof Hosting Providers to help Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and network defenders mitigate cybercriminal activity enabled by Bulletproof Hosting (BPH) providers. A BPH provider is an internet infrastructure provider that knowingly leases infrastructure to cybercriminals. These providers enable malicious activities such as ransomware, phishing, malware delivery, and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, posing an imminent and significant risk to the resilience and safety of critical systems and services. The guide provides recommendations to reduce the effectiveness of BPH infrastructure while minimizing disruptions to legitimate activity. Key Recommendations for ISPs and Network Defenders: Curate malicious resource lists: Use threat intelligence feeds and sharing channels to build lists of malicious resources. Implement filters: Apply filters to block malicious traffic while avoiding disruptions to legitimate activity. Analyze traffic: Monitor network traffic to identify anomalies and supplement malicious resource lists. Use logging systems: Record Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) and IP addresses, issue alerts for malicious activity, and keep logs updated. Share intelligence: Collaborate with public and private entities to strengthen cybersecurity defenses. Additional Recommendations for ISPs: Notify customers: Inform customers about malicious resource lists and filters, with opt-out options. Provide filters: Offer premade filters for customers to apply in their networks. Set accountability standards: Work with other ISPs to create codes of conduct for BPH abuse prevention. Vet customers: Collect and verify customer information to prevent BPH providers from leasing ISP infrastructure. CISA and its partners urge ISPs and network defenders to implement these recommendations to mitigate risks posed by BPH providers. By reducing the effectiveness of BPH infrastructure, defenders can force cybercriminals to rely on legitimate providers that comply with legal processes. For more information, visit the full guide.

Impact

Bulletproof Hosting providers, cybercriminal activities including ransomware, phishing, malware delivery, denial-of-service attacks.

Exploitation Status

The exploitation status is currently unknown. Monitor vendor advisories and security bulletins for updates.

Timeline

Newly disclosed

Remediation

Curate malicious resource lists, implement filters to block malicious traffic, analyze network traffic for anomalies, use logging systems to track ASNs and IP addresses, share intelligence with public and private entities, notify customers about malicious resources, provide premade filters, set accountability standards, and vet customers to prevent BPH abuse.

Additional Information

This threat intelligence is aggregated from trusted cybersecurity sources. For the most up-to-date information, technical details, and official vendor guidance, please refer to the original article linked below.

Related Topics: This incident relates to Ransomware, Phishing, Malware, and 1 more.

Related Coverage

Nobody was checking the drives that encrypt your laptop

Help Net Security

A recent investigation by Milan Brož and his colleagues found that many solid-state drives (SSDs) labeled as having hardware encryption may not be secure. They tested 38 drives compliant with the TCG Opal2 standard, commonly used in millions of laptops and workstations. The researchers discovered that the drives failed to adequately protect data, raising concerns about the reliability of hardware encryption. This affects users and organizations relying on these drives for data security, as they may be under the false impression that their sensitive information is safe. With the increasing use of SSDs in computing, this issue highlights a significant gap in security practices and the need for more rigorous checks on encryption technologies.

Jul 21, 2026

AI agents are still logging in as humans

Help Net Security

Recent analysis shows that many large organizations are using multiple AI platforms simultaneously, which raises potential security concerns. Developers and marketing teams often mix sanctioned tools with personal accounts, leading to a complex environment where AI agents may log in as human users. This situation increases the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches, as the boundaries between professional and personal use of AI tools blur. The data, gathered from over 20,000 organizations, indicates that this trend has been growing since June 2022. Companies need to be aware of these risks and implement stricter security measures to protect sensitive information.

Jul 21, 2026

AI-generated reports push GNOME to shorten its disclosure window

Help Net Security

The GNOME project is responding to a surge in AI-generated security vulnerability reports that are being submitted to its maintainers. Many of these reports do not disclose that they were created using language models, leading to an overwhelming volume of submissions. As a result, GNOME is changing its policies regarding how it tracks and discloses vulnerabilities. Michael Catanzaro, who has been overseeing GNOME's security issue tracking since late 2020, is at the forefront of these changes. This shift is significant because it aims to improve the efficiency of handling security issues in open source projects, ensuring that genuine vulnerabilities are prioritized amidst the noise created by automated reports.

Jul 21, 2026

Estée Lauder discloses data breach via Oracle E-Business flaw

BleepingComputer

Estée Lauder has informed customers about a data breach that occurred due to a vulnerability in Oracle's E-Business Suite, which the company uses for its human resources operations. Hackers exploited this flaw, potentially compromising the personal data of affected individuals. While the specific details about the type of data accessed have not been disclosed, this incident raises concerns about the security of sensitive information within large organizations. Customers are advised to monitor their accounts for any unusual activity as the company works to address the breach. This incident serves as a reminder for businesses to ensure their software systems are regularly updated and secure against known vulnerabilities.

Jul 20, 2026

JadePuffer agentic attacks now target AI model data with ransomware

BleepingComputer

A new strain of malware, named EncForge, has been developed by the JadePuffer autonomous AI agent. This malware specifically targets AI-related assets, including training datasets, vector databases, and model checkpoints, by encrypting them and holding them for ransom. This shift in focus to AI model data represents a concerning trend, as organizations increasingly rely on these assets for their operations. If attackers succeed, they can disrupt AI development and implementation, potentially causing significant financial and operational damage to affected companies. As AI technology continues to evolve, the need for robust security measures to protect these critical assets becomes ever more urgent.

Jul 20, 2026

Hugging Face uses GLM 5.2 to investigate AI agent-driven cyberattack

SCM feed for Latest

Hugging Face, a company known for its work in AI and machine learning, has recently turned to an open-weight model named GLM 5.2 to investigate a cyberattack driven by AI agents. The shift to this model comes after they encountered limitations with their previous frontier model guardrails, which restricted their capabilities. This situation illustrates the evolving challenges in cybersecurity, particularly as AI technologies become more integrated into both offensive and defensive strategies. The use of AI in cyberattacks raises significant concerns about the potential for more sophisticated and automated threats. Companies in the tech sector should take note of these developments as they may need to adjust their security measures to counteract AI-driven vulnerabilities.

Jul 20, 2026